- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 11:30:11 -0700
- To: Jeff Mixter <jeffmixter@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFfrAFqqDqNi-WuWRrJf27DGJytsoyOobHX26WMMrhFA8zaPMA@mail.gmail.com>
On 15 May 2013 11:11, "Jeff Mixter" <jeffmixter@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am working on a data model that I can use to map some existing data into schema.org. I am having a bit of trouble figuring out if I am using schema:contentLocation properly. While at first it seemed straight forward, I found a bit of a problem in the range of the object property > > The set range for contentLocation is a Place. When choosing a place, I wanted to be very specific and use LocalBusiness (which is listed as a sub-class of Place). The reason for this is that I would like to add the fact that this place is also connected to an organization that has a name, email address etc. It is also important to add that this organization is not a creator, contributor, publisher etc. but rather simply a retainer of the thing being described. When you link to the LocalBusiness description however, it is listed as being a sub-class of Organization (which seems to contradict the set range of contentLocation). > > I know that domains and ranges are suggestions in schema's data model (i.e. not strictly set) but I wanted to make sure that the resulting triple makes sense. I also wanted to see if anyone had any suggestions on how to better describe the relationship. Quick reply by phone: I believe LocalBusiness has two supertypes, Organization and Place. So I think this may be fine for your scenario. Possibly we don't display multiple supertypes very well in the schema.orgsite navigation. Dan > -- > Jeff Mixter > jeffmixter@gmail.com > 440-773-9079
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2013 18:30:38 UTC