Re: Proposal: VisualArtwork

Hi Jeff:

Thanks for the nice words about http://www.productontology.org ;-)

As for the official endorsement: While I would of course love to see an official recommendation, www.productontology.org types are indeed mentioned on the schema.org site.

See

    http://schema.org/IndividualProduct

and scroll down to the examples section.

Best 
Martin

On May 8, 2013, at 4:48 PM, Young,Jeff (OR) wrote:

> I've been using the Product Ontology for these kinds of things as an
> additional type to schema:CreativeWork.
> 
> http://productontology.org/id/Sculpture
> http://productontology.org/id/Photograph
> http://productontology.org/id/Collage
> etc.
> 
> This is based on Wikipedia, so there are some cases that don't work out
> ideally like "Photographic_printing" instead of "Photographic_print".
> Nevertheless, I am pleased much more often than I am disappointed. It
> would also be nice to hear the general Schema.org community encouraging
> the use of the Product Ontology more vocally.
> 
> I agree that having a general purpose VisualArtwork class with these
> extra properties would be nice, though. 
> 
> Jeff
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Paul Watson [mailto:lazarus@lazaruscorporation.co.uk]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 3:42 PM
>> To: public-vocabs@w3.org
>> Subject: Proposal: VisualArtwork
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> This is a proposal for a new Type: Thing > CreativeWork >
> VisualArtwork
>> 
>> I am aware that there are already sub-Types for "Painting",
>> "Sculpture", and "Photograph", but this doesn't seem like a viable way
>> forward. There are many other types of artwork (printmaking, drawing,
>> collage, assemblage, digital art, etc.) and it seems illogical to
>> create new Types for each artform.
>> 
>> So my proposal is for the 'VisualArtwork' Type to be used instead of
>> "Painting" or "Sculpture", and instead of "Photograph" where the
>> photograph in question is being presented in context as an artwork as
>> opposed to forensic photography, etc.
>> 
>> A number of additional properties enable would allow a wider range of
>> visual artwork media to use this type. These properties are:
>> 
>> * artform (e.g. Painting, Drawing, Sculpture, Print, Photograph,
>> Assemblage, Collage, etc.)
>> * materials (e.g. Oil, Watercolour, Linoprint, Marble, Cyanotype,
>> Digital, Lithograph, Pencil, Mixed Media, etc.)
>> * surface (e.g. Canvas, Paper, Wood, Board, etc.)
>> * width (an instance of http://schema.org/Distance)
>> * height (an instance of http://schema.org/Distance)
>> * depth (an instance of http://schema.org/Distance)
>> * edition (For multiples such as prints, the number of copies in the
>> edition)
>> 
>> As you can see, rather than having many different subTytpes of
> Creative
>> work for paintings, sculptures, prints, drawings, collages, tapestry,
>> etc, the VisualArtwork proposal allows the artform to be designated
>> under the new "artform" property.
>> 
>> I have written up the proposed new VisualArtwork type at http://new-
>> media.lazaruscorporation.co.uk/2013/05/2nd-draft-an-idea-for-an-
>> alternative-schema-org-type-for-artwork/
>> 
>> I would be interested to hear whether this proposal would have any
>> support? Apart from implementing microdata and RDFa Lite on website
>> this is my first foray into serious thought about extending schemas,
>> and I won't be offended by any criticism!
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 

--------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen

e-mail:  hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www:     http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
         http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype:   mfhepp 
twitter: mfhepp

Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
=================================================================
* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/

Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:37:29 UTC