- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 14:46:26 +0200
- To: Quotations Book <quotationsbook@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org
On 13 May 2013 14:25, Quotations Book <quotationsbook@gmail.com> wrote: > > I run quotationsbook.com. We've made very sincere efforts to promote a distinct type for a quote, or a citation. Effectively, a quote can be seen as a statement made by a person or entity, and it has great wider implications for any citation marked up anywhere, on a blog post, web page, book, or otherwise. > > By it's nature, a quote is short (whatever that is defined as) - so entire books/essays are not quotable. It doesn't quite fit article, news or book content types. > > Our existing structured data efforts are available to syndicate freely here: > http://quotationsbook.com/services/ > > We initially went for Google Base, then a different sort of markup. Subsequently, I looked at Google Rich Snippets, and found there was no way to markup a quote that was dedicated. We also contributed all our content to Freebase under a C-C license. > > So - I need some help. Is there any neat schema within schema.org that fits a quote? Can someone help me create one that is agreed upon by all search engines? As it happens a team at Google were also working towards just such a schema. I've posted a draft in the W3C WebSchemas wiki here based on their investigations: http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/QuotationSchema The sketch adds this new vocabulary: Quotation, spokenByCharacter, incorrectlyAttributedTo, aboutEvent, fromEvent, addressee... but also re-uses a few existing properties. How does this look? Dan
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2013 12:47:01 UTC