- From: Barry Norton <barry.norton@ontotext.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 23:22:30 +0100
- To: "William L. Anderson" <band@acm.org>
- CC: public-vocabs@w3.org
Thanks, William, I'd meant to footnote that. Barry On 08/05/13 23:20, William L. Anderson wrote: > FRBR: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_Requirements_for_Bibliographic_Records > > /WLA > > On May 8, 2013, at 5:08 PM, Barry Norton <barry.norton@ontotext.com> wrote: > >> Sorry, Karen, I think I wasn't clear. >> >> [ … ] >> What I meant about FRBR is that it's a vocabulary often used to represent how a creative work derives from a creative work derives from a creative work. I've in mind that next week's webinar presentation will have an updated (but derived) slideset from the one next week, and this may lead to a third derivative for a couple of conferences in the coming weeks. >> [ … ] >> On 08/05/13 23:03, Karen Coyle wrote: >>> [ … ] >>>> I don't think this is just an academic niche, but also common in >>>> business. It does raise the spector of wanting FRBR-like chains of >>>> derivatives though... >>> I'm almost afraid to ask what you mean by "FRBR...", but... could you explain? >>> [ … ] >
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 22:22:55 UTC