Actually, we take great pain to not allow this kind of polymorphism in schema.org. Let us avoid overloading actor this way. guha On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Yaar Schnitman <yaar@google.com> wrote: > James, Karen, Evain, > > I think that renaming Action.performedBy to Action.actor are ok. Even > though Event.actor is currently defined to be an actor in a theater show, > Action does not inherit from Event, so .actor can have a new meaning. If > Action ends up extending Event, like some have suggested, its still ok that > the property's semantic is made more strict. Alternatively, Event.actor > should probably move down to the TheaterEvent type. > > -Yaar > >
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2013 18:13:31 UTC