W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > May 2013

Re: Activity Proposal Review

From: Guha <guha@google.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 11:13:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPAGhv9Mxh0EZ3d0cmQ8L0ohCeq01dTTqu9F60QOnThOh7AEJw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yaar Schnitman <yaar@google.com>
Cc: W3C Vocabularies <public-vocabs@w3.org>, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch>, "kcoyle@kcoyle.net" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Actually, we take great pain to not allow this kind of polymorphism in
schema.org. Let us avoid overloading actor this way.


On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Yaar Schnitman <yaar@google.com> wrote:

> James, Karen, Evain,
> I think that renaming Action.performedBy to Action.actor are ok. Even
> though Event.actor is currently defined to be an actor in a theater show,
> Action does not inherit from Event, so .actor can have a new meaning. If
> Action ends up extending Event, like some have suggested, its still ok that
> the property's semantic is made more strict. Alternatively, Event.actor
> should probably move down to the TheaterEvent type.
> -Yaar
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2013 18:13:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:27 UTC