Re: Official OWL version outdated

On 5/7/13 8:44 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 8, 2013, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>
>     Looking at the OWL version of schema.org <http://schema.org> at
>
>     http://schema.org/docs/schemaorg.owl
>
>     I notice that this seems to be a rather old version, while the
>     RDFa version
>
>     http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html
>
>     seems to be more recent. (When) will the OWL version be fixed?
>
>
> Is it useful? what do you prefer? The use of OWL is pretty weak since 
> we're so flexible.
>
> Does rdf/xml vs rdfa (or json-ld etc) matter to you? What about the 
> choice of all in one big file vs per-term?
>
> Dan

Dan,

It is very useful. Unfortunately, the effort to track and sync  has stalled.

Kingsley
>
>
>
>     Thanks
>     Holger
>
>
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen