- From: Barry Norton <barry.norton@ontotext.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 23:08:26 +0100
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
Sorry, Karen, I think I wasn't clear. I am asking about representing the slides themselves, but partly because I want to use them to link to events (with recordings very like TED ones... in spirit, I can't speak for quality ;) ) What I meant about FRBR is that it's a vocabulary often used to represent how a creative work derives from a creative work derives from a creative work. I've in mind that next week's webinar presentation will have an updated (but derived) slideset from the one next week, and this may lead to a third derivative for a couple of conferences in the coming weeks. Barry On 08/05/13 23:03, Karen Coyle wrote: > > > On 5/8/13 2:33 PM, Barry Norton wrote: >> >> Thought about ImageGallery and some others. >> >> In this case I'm less interested in the 'containership' than in the >> (distinctive?) property of having being delivered in certain real life >> (physical, like meetups and conferences) and virtual events (like our >> webinar next week), and these being captured in media objects (in our >> case Vimeo recordings). > > Barry, > > This makes it sound to me like it is more event-based than it is > format-based. Are you including recorded conference proceedings and > TED talks, that have a mix of slides and recording of the live event? > I originally thought you were focused on the slides themselves. Now > your proposal seems to be recorded "performances" - basically, today's > version of conference proceedings. > > >> >> I don't think this is just an academic niche, but also common in >> business. It does raise the spector of wanting FRBR-like chains of >> derivatives though... > > I'm almost afraid to ask what you mean by "FRBR...", but... could you > explain? > > Thanks, > kc > >> >> Cheers, >> >> Barry >> >> >> >> On 08/05/13 21:36, Dan Brickley wrote: >>> On 8 May 2013 16:37, Barry Norton <barry.norton@ontotext.com> wrote: >>>> I'd like to propose a new subclass of CreativeWork for slidesets. >>>> >>>> As background, I'm currently encoding Slideshare views, as part of the >>>> EUCLID Project (euclid-project.eu) public monitoring application. >>>> >>>> I've seen that one can attach interactionCount to CreativeWork - >>>> although >>>> it's a shame that this is direct, not an event in itself (and I don't >>>> have >>>> the data to track each view), I was thinking of encoding each poll of >>>> the >>>> Slideshare API in its own named graph and using the latest such to >>>> surface a >>>> 'current count' through RDFa. >>>> >>>> Comments? >>> Seems useful to me. Well there's two parts; indicating that something >>> is a kind of container for a set of slides, and then the more social >>> Web analytics piece for talking about view counts. I don't view our >>> UserInteraction vocabulary as something we should be building on right >>> now, but gathering requirements for improving it is certainly useful. >>> >>> As for saying "this is a slideshow page", the closest we have to date >>> is http://schema.org/ImageGallery ... is this similar? >>> >>> Dan >> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 22:08:52 UTC