Agreed… +1 Jim Klo Senior Software Engineer Center for Software Engineering SRI International t. @nsomnac On May 28, 2013, at 11:13 AM, Guha <guha@google.com> wrote: > Actually, we take great pain to not allow this kind of polymorphism in schema.org. Let us avoid overloading actor this way. > > guha > > > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Yaar Schnitman <yaar@google.com> wrote: > James, Karen, Evain, > > I think that renaming Action.performedBy to Action.actor are ok. Even though Event.actor is currently defined to be an actor in a theater show, Action does not inherit from Event, so .actor can have a new meaning. If Action ends up extending Event, like some have suggested, its still ok that the property's semantic is made more strict. Alternatively, Event.actor should probably move down to the TheaterEvent type. > > -Yaar > >
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2013 20:14:37 UTC