- From: Barry Norton <barry.norton@ontotext.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 22:43:40 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- CC: public-vocabs@w3.org
They seem to link to social media well, tracking tweets of their objects for instance, but not to one another. On the stuff you've started (user views, favourites, etc.) they've a lot. (I've some questions on that, but I can ask offline...) Still, you need pro subscriptions to get the time-based stuff I want to encode directly, rather than by polling. Barry On 08/05/13 22:39, Dan Brickley wrote: > On 8 May 2013 22:33, Barry Norton <barry.norton@ontotext.com> wrote: > >> Thought about ImageGallery and some others. >> >> In this case I'm less interested in the 'containership' than in the >> (distinctive?) property of having being delivered in certain real life >> (physical, like meetups and conferences) and virtual events (like our >> webinar next week), and these being captured in media objects (in our case >> Vimeo recordings). >> >> I don't think this is just an academic niche, but also common in business. >> It does raise the spector of wanting FRBR-like chains of derivatives >> though... > Indeed! The way we try to deal with the spectre of seductively-complex > modeling at schema.org is to try to stay grounded in the markup and > site structures of real Web sites. Is there much to be learned here > from how - for example - Vimeo, Slideshare and others organize their > content? > > Dan
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 21:44:05 UTC