RE: Activity Proposal Review

+1

From: Guha [mailto:guha@google.com]
Sent: mardi, 28. mai 2013 20:13
To: Yaar Schnitman
Cc: W3C Vocabularies; Evain, Jean-Pierre; kcoyle@kcoyle.net; James M Snell
Subject: Re: Activity Proposal Review

Actually, we take great pain to not allow this kind of polymorphism in schema.org<http://schema.org>. Let us avoid overloading actor this way.

guha

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Yaar Schnitman <yaar@google.com<mailto:yaar@google.com>> wrote:
James, Karen, Evain,

I think that renaming Action.performedBy to Action.actor are ok. Even though Event.actor is currently defined to be an actor in a theater show, Action does not inherit from Event, so .actor can have a new meaning. If Action ends up extending Event, like some have suggested, its still ok that the property's semantic is made more strict. Alternatively, Event.actor should probably move down to the TheaterEvent type.

-Yaar


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

**************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
**************************************************