Re: Official OWL version outdated

On Wednesday, May 8, 2013, Holger Knublauch wrote:

> Looking at the OWL version of schema.org at
>
>     http://schema.org/docs/**schemaorg.owl<http://schema.org/docs/schemaorg.owl>
>
> I notice that this seems to be a rather old version, while the RDFa version
>
>     http://schema.org/docs/schema_**org_rdfa.html<http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html>
>
> seems to be more recent. (When) will the OWL version be fixed?


Is it useful? what do you prefer? The use of OWL is pretty weak since we're
so flexible.

Does rdf/xml vs rdfa (or json-ld etc) matter to you? What about the choice
of all in one big file vs per-term?

Dan




> Thanks
> Holger
>
>
>
>
>