- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 12:56:37 +0100
- To: "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
- Cc: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 7 May 2013 12:46, Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org> wrote: > This is the second proposal from the Schema Bib Extend > Group<http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/>, consisting of 60+ people > from a broad cross section of publishers, libraries, and others interested > in enhancing Schema.org's capabilities in the area of bibliographic and > associated resources. > > Proposal: > To create a new Type: 'Collection' and two new properties for Thing and/or > CreativeWork > > > Details: > > New Type: Collection > This is a collection in the broadest and simplest possible sense. It is a > set of things. The things in a collection may be thought of as its > "parts", even though the membership could be ephemeral. Interesting :) How would we distinguish this from the notion of a 'type' or 'class' that is built-in to schema.org? Is this specifically library-like or cultural heritage notion of a collection? Or is it a general purpose data structure for listing bundles of things? My suspicion is that it's the latter, but it could easily be mistaken for a very general purpose mechanism. If there's a bibliographic / cultural heritage problem we can solve here, while avoiding getting into heavier 'theory of parts' territory (e.g. http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/Mereotopology.pdf) I'd be happy... Dan > Sub-classed to: Thing > CreativeWork > Collection > Properties likely to be used from CreativeWork > * about (e.g. for collection themes) > * contentLocation (e.g. for museum/archive collections) > * creator (e.g. for collection curators) > > New property for CreativeWork (or perhaps for Thing) > As a matter of principle, anything imaginable can be thought of has having > parts. Although we are primarily interested in this property for sake of > modelling collections and multi-part works, a broader treatment as a > property of schema:Thing would be appreciated. > * Property: hasPart > * Expected Type: Thing > * Description: A thing that is part of this CreativeWork. For example > things in a collection or parts in a multi-part work > > New property for Thing > This is the same schema:isPartOf property as currently found in the > http://schema.org/WebPage class with schema:CollectionPage as the range. > We would like it promoted for broader use, particularly in this case, for > use with a Collection Type. > * Property: isPartOf > * Expected Type: CreativeWork or Thing(dependant on choice for hasPart) > * Description: Inverse of hasPart > > More information and some examples can be found on the SchemaBibExtend > Wiki <http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Collection>. > > ~Richard. > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 11:57:09 UTC