Re: Singularity: why has "children" not been renamed to "child"?

On 5/9/2013 9:36, Dan Brickley wrote:
> I agree with adding a machine-readable pointer from the old to new 
> form too; we have to figure out some implementation details but it'll 
> happen.

Great - this is appreciated. Once you are at this, please also check 
whether it's possible to add information on inverse properties and 
max-cardinality to the property metadata (this is related to the 
parallel thread on the OWL version).

Thanks
Holger

Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 23:41:58 UTC