- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 18:40:30 -0700
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Cc: Jim Klo <jim.klo@sri.com>, Yaar Schnitman <yaar@google.com>, Steve Macbeth <Steve.Macbeth@microsoft.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: [snip] >> A few of us on the Learning Registry team have been considering harmonizing >> our LR Paradata 1.0 spec (1) with Schema.org and the Actions proposal really >> is a great step. The Paradata spec is an enhancement of ActivityStrea.ms (2) >> primarily directed towards Educational Activities. >[snip] Btw, FWIW, I am one of the editors for the activitystrea.ms specs.. I know that there are a number of important differences between this proposal and those specs and that the use cases for each are a bit different, but I am certainly interested in making sure that there is good alignment between this and what we've done in activitystrea.ms. - James
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2013 01:41:18 UTC