Friday, 30 March 2001
Wednesday, 28 March 2001
Tuesday, 27 March 2001
Wednesday, 28 March 2001
Tuesday, 27 March 2001
- RE: Proposed Simplifications to the DeltaV protocol
- Re: Proposed Simplifications to the DeltaV protocol
- RE: Eliminating the Label header
- Eliminating the Label header
- Re: Proposed Simplifications to the DeltaV protocol
- Proposed Simplifications to the DeltaV protocol
- Re: DAV:lockdiscovery on a checked-out resource
Monday, 26 March 2001
Friday, 23 March 2001
- Re: DAV:lockdiscovery on a checked-out resource
- RE: DAV:lockdiscovery on a checked-out resource
- RE: DAV:lockdiscovery on a checked-out resource
- Re: DAV:lockdiscovery on a checked-out resource
- Re: DAV:lockdiscovery on a checked-out resource
- RE: DAV:lockdiscovery on a checked-out resource
Thursday, 22 March 2001
- RE: DAV:lockdiscovery on a checked-out resource
- Re: DAV:lockdiscovery on a checked-out resource
- Re: DAV:lockdiscovery on a checked-out resource
- Re: DAV:lockdiscovery on a checked-out resource
- DAV:lockdiscovery on a checked-out resource
Thursday, 15 March 2001
Wednesday, 14 March 2001
Tuesday, 13 March 2001
Monday, 12 March 2001
- RE: Questions/clarification on MKACTIVITY method
- draft-14 is now up on the deltav web site.
- RE: No OPTIONS response for the variant option?
- RE: Questions/clarification on MKACTIVITY method
- RE: Questions/clarification on MKACTIVITY method
- RE: Questions/clarification on MKACTIVITY method
- RE: Questions/clarification on MKACTIVITY method
- Questions/clarification on MKACTIVITY method
- Re: No OPTIONS response for the variant option?
Friday, 9 March 2001
Wednesday, 7 March 2001
Tuesday, 6 March 2001
- Re: How to supply an activity for VERSION-CONTROL?
- Re: How to supply an activity for VERSION-CONTROL?
- Re: How to supply an activity for VERSION-CONTROL?
- Re: FW: webDAV - web authoring or flexible two-way web interface ?
Monday, 5 March 2001
Thursday, 1 March 2001
Wednesday, 28 February 2001
Tuesday, 27 February 2001
Monday, 26 February 2001
- RE: Design team meetings at IETF 50
- RE: Design team meetings at IETF 50
- Design team meetings at IETF 50
Sunday, 25 February 2001
Saturday, 24 February 2001
- Re: Comments on Baseline option (in 12.3)
- RE: OPTIONS
- draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-14 has been submitted to ietf-drafts
Wednesday, 21 February 2001
Tuesday, 20 February 2001
Monday, 19 February 2001
Sunday, 18 February 2001
Saturday, 17 February 2001
- Re: Thank you Geoff!
- Re: BASELINE option
- Re: possible new property?
- disjoint baselines
- Re: possible new property?
- Thank you Geoff!
- RE: OPTIONS
- Re (3): possible new property?
- BASELINE option
- Re: OPTIONS
- RE: OPTIONS
- Overview of Core versioning
- Option "pre-requisites"
- Status-reporting & refusing depth header
Friday, 16 February 2001
- Re: possible new property?
- Re: possible new property?
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-13.txt
- possible new property?
Thursday, 15 February 2001
Wednesday, 14 February 2001
Thursday, 15 February 2001
Wednesday, 14 February 2001
- Re: Auto-version corrections
- Re: Auto-version corrections
- RE: Auto-version corrections
- RE: Auto-version corrections
- Re: Auto-version corrections
Tuesday, 13 February 2001
Monday, 12 February 2001
- Re: Comments on Baseline option (in 12.3)
- Re: Option abuse
- RE: DAV:compare-baseline REPORT
- Re: DTD Confusion
- RE: Comments on Baseline option (in 12.3)
- RE: Comments on Baseline option (in 12.3)
- RE: Comments on Baseline option (in 12.3)
- RE: Comments on Baseline option (in 12.3)
- RE: Comments on Baseline option (in 12.3)
- Re: DeltaV doesn't support a true client workspace
- RE: Comments on Baseline option (in 12.3)
- RE: object model and IDL for Delta-v
- RE: Part 1, Comments on draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-12.2
- RE: FW: DeltaV doesn't support a true client workspace
- Re: DAV:compare-baseline REPORT
- RE: FW: DeltaV doesn't support a true client workspace
- Comments on Baseline option (in 12.3)
Sunday, 11 February 2001
Saturday, 10 February 2001
- Part 1, Comments on draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-12.2
- OT: Plurals of Acronyms and Initialisms
- Re: Option abuse
- RE: FW: DeltaV doesn't support a true client workspace
- RE: Option abuse
- Re: Auto-version corrections
- Re: FW: DeltaV doesn't support a true client workspace
- Re: DeltaV Lack of global properties
- Re: minor comments regarding 12.2
- Re: DAV:compare-baseline REPORT
- Re: DAV:compare-baseline REPORT
- RE: minor comments regarding 12.2
- RE: DAV:compare-baseline REPORT
- RE: typos in version tree report example
- Re: DAV:compare-baseline REPORT
- Re: minor comments regarding 12.2
- Re: DAV:compare-baseline REPORT
- Re: minor comments regarding 12.2
- Re: minor comments regarding 12.2
- Re: DAV:compare-baseline REPORT
- Re: FW: DeltaV doesn't support a true client workspace
- Re: minor comments regarding 12.2
- Re: DeltaV doesn't support a true client workspace
- Re: Interoperability and client support of options
- RE: DeltaV Lack of global properties
- Re: Interoperability and client support of options
- RE: DeltaV doesn't support a true client workspace
- Interoperability and client support of options
- FW: DeltaV doesn't support a true client workspace
Friday, 9 February 2001
- Auto-version corrections
- RE: DeltaV doesn't support a true client workspace
- RE: Autoversion confusion
- FW: DeltaV doesn't support a true client workspace
- DAV:compare-baseline REPORT
- minor comments regarding 12.2
- RE: DeltaV doesn't support a true client workspace
- RE: Autoversion confusion
- Re: DTD Confusion (i.e., opportunity)
- PUT != PUT? (was: RE: Autoversion confusion)
- RE: Autoversion confusion
- Re: DTD Confusion (i.e., opportunity)
- RE: Autoversion confusion
- Re: Workspace option comments
- typos in version tree report example
- Re: Straw poll: what options did you review?
- Re: Straw poll: what options did you review?
- Re: DTD Confusion
- RE: Submitting DeltaV as Informational RFC? (was: Split ting off core: where we stand)
- Re: Autoversion confusion
- RE: section 11.3
- Re: Submitting DeltaV as Informational RFC? (was: Splitting off core: where we stand)
- Re: Autoversion confusion
- Re: DTD Confusion
- Re: Submitting DeltaV as Informational RFC? (was: Splitting off core: where we stand)
- RE: Security through Obscurity
- RE: Submitting DeltaV as Informational RFC? (was: Split ting off core: where we stand)
- RE: Status reporting comments
- RE: Autoversion confusion
- RE: VERSION-CONTROL status reporting
- RE: VERSION-CONTROL status reporting
- RE: Status reporting comments
- RE: DTD Confusion
- RE: DTD Confusion
- Security through Obscurity
- Re: Workspace option comments
- Re: Workspace option comments
- Submitting DeltaV as Informational RFC? (was: Splitting off core: where we stand)
- Re: Status reporting comments
- RE: Autoversion confusion
- Antwort: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 2/9/00 (Friday) 12-1pm EST
- Workspace option comments
- RE: VERSION-CONTROL status reporting
- Status reporting comments
- VERSION-CONTROL status reporting
- RE: DTD Confusion
- RE: Splitting off core: where we stand
- RE: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 2/9/00 (Friday) 12-1pm EST
- Re: DTD Confusion
- Re: DeltaV Lack of global properties
- Re: DTD Confusion
- Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 2/9/00 (Friday) 12-1pm EST
- RE: Straw poll: what options did you review?
- RE: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 2/9/00 (Friday) 12-1pm EST
- RE: Splitting off core: where we stand
- Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 2/9/00 (Friday) 12-1pm EST
Thursday, 8 February 2001
- Re: Straw poll: what options did you review?
- RE: Splitting off core: where we stand
- Re: Splitting off core: where we stand
- Re: Splitting off core: where we stand
- Re: Straw poll results so far
- Re: Splitting off core: where we stand
- RE: Autoversion confusion
- RE: Splitting off core: where we stand
- RE: Splitting off core: where we stand
- RE: Splitting off core: where we stand
- Re: Straw poll results so far
- RE: Splitting off core: where we stand
- RE: Autoversion confusion
- Re: Straw poll results so far
- RE: Splitting the document
- RE: Straw poll results so far
- RE: Splitting off core: where we stand
- Straw poll results so far
- Re: Splitting off core: where we stand
- Re: Straw poll: what options did you review?
- Re: Splitting off core: where we stand
- Splitting the document
- Re: DTD Confusion
- Re: DTD Confusion
- Re: Splitting off core: where we stand
- Re: DeltaV Lack of global properties
- RE: DeltaV Lack of global properties
- Re: Autoversion confusion
- RE: Autoversion confusion
- Re: Straw poll: what options did you review?
- RE: Splitting off core: where we stand
- section 11.3
- Re: Splitting off core: where we stand
- Re: Splitting off core: where we stand
- Re: [Moderator Action] RE: Straw poll: what options did you review?
- RE: Splitting off core: where we stand
- Re: Splitting off core: where we stand
- [Moderator Action] RE: Straw poll: what options did you review?
- RE: Splitting off core: where we stand
- RE: Splitting off core: where we stand
- RE: Splitting off core: where we stand
- RE: Straw poll: what options did you review?
- RE: Straw poll: what options did you review?
Wednesday, 7 February 2001
- Re (2): Splitting off core: where we stand
- Re: Splitting off core: where we stand
- Re: Straw poll: what options did you review?
- RE: Splitting off core: where we stand
- Re: Properties, ETags and versions
- RE: Splitting off core: where we stand
- Straw poll: what options did you review?
- RE: DTD Confusion
- Splitting off core: where we stand
- Re: Autoversion confusion
- RE: Autoversion confusion
- RE: DeltaV Lack of global properties
- Re: DeltaV Lack of global properties
- RE: errors in 9.8 and 9.9
- Re: errors in 9.8 and 9.9
- RE: errors in 9.8 and 9.9
- Re: errors in 9.8 and 9.9
- RE: errors in 9.8 and 9.9
- errors in 9.8 and 9.9
- RE: Autoversion confusion
- Re: DeltaV Lack of global properties
- Properties, ETags and versions
- RE: Autoversion confusion
- DeltaV Lack of global properties
Tuesday, 6 February 2001
- RE: Labels and Status
- Re: resourcetype (was: RE: Core versioning issues and nits)
- Re: resourcetype (was: RE: Core versioning issues and nits)
- RE: FW: DeltaV Passthrough issues
- Re: resourcetype (was: RE: Core versioning issues and nits)
- resourcetype (was: RE: Core versioning issues and nits)
- Re: Autoversion confusion
- New DAV Versioning DTD.
- Re: DAV Versioning DTD.
- Re: Complexity and Core Considerations
- Re: DAV Versioning DTD.
- Re: DAV Versioning DTD.
- Re: Labels and Status
- Re: WebDAV/DeltaV Interoperability and XML Validation
Monday, 5 February 2001
- RE: Complexity and Core Considerations
- RE: Core versioning issues and nits
- Re: Option abuse
- RE: Labels and Status
- RE: FW: DeltaV Passthrough issues
- RE: properties of version histories (was: Re: Core versioning issues and nits)
- Re: DTD Confusion
- RE: Core versioning issues and nits
- RE: Core versioning issues and nits
- RE: Core versioning issues and nits
- RE: Labels and Status
- Autoversion confusion
- RE: Core versioning issues and nits
- Re: DAV Versioning DTD.
- Re: WebDAV/DeltaV Interoperability and XML Validation
- draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-12.2 is now available
- Re: response body (was: Re: Comments on VERSION-CONTROL)
- Re: autoversion header (was: Re: DeltaV doesn't support a true client workspace)
- Re: Complexity and Core Considerations
- resource type/state (was: Re: Core versioning issues and nits)
- Re: response body (was: Re: Comments on VERSION-CONTROL)
- Re: OPTIONS and Depth (was: Re: Core versioning issues and nits)
- Re: response body (was: Re: Comments on VERSION-CONTROL)
- Re: Complexity and Core Considerations
- RE: LOCK and VERSION-CONTROL (was: Re: Core versioning issues and nits)
- Re: Complexity and Core Considerations
- autoversion header (was: Re: DeltaV doesn't support a true client workspace)
- response body (was: Re: Comments on VERSION-CONTROL)
- LOCK and VERSION-CONTROL (was: Re: Core versioning issues and nits)
- what to implement? (was: Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 2/2/00 (Friday) 12-1pm EST)
- Re: CHECKIN and properties
- Re: Section 2.1.1 comments
- Re: Comments on -12: properties, REPORT, OPTIONS
- Re: Comments on -12: properties, REPORT, OPTIONS
- Re: Comments on VERSION-CONTROL
- Re: Core versioning issues and nits
- Re: Comments on -12: properties, REPORT, OPTIONS
- Re: Terms
- Re: Labels and Status
- OPTIONS and Depth (was: Re: Core versioning issues and nits)
- properties of version histories (was: Re: Core versioning issues and nits)
- Re: Introduction
- Re: Labels and Status
- Re: From Juergen Reuter
- Re: Labels and Status
- Re: Patches
- Re: Core versioning issues and nits
- Re: Core versioning issues and nits
- Re: Core versioning issues and nits
- Re: Core versioning issues and nits
- DAV Versioning DTD.
Sunday, 4 February 2001
- Re: WebDAV/DeltaV Interoperability and XML Validation
- Re: Core versioning issues and nits
- Re: Core versioning issues and nits
- Re: Core versioning issues and nits
- RE: Complexity and Core Considerations
- Re: Re (2): Labels and Status
- Re: DTD Confusion
- Re: Option abuse
- Re: WebDAV/DeltaV Interoperability and XML Validation
- Re: DTD Confusion
- Re: FW: DeltaV Passthrough issues
- Compatibility
- WebDAV/DeltaV Interoperability and XML Validation
- DTD Confusion
- Option abuse
- RE: DeltaV doesn't support a true client workspace
- RE: Re (2): Labels and Status
Saturday, 3 February 2001
- RE: Re (2): Complexity and Core Considerations
- Re (2): Complexity and Core Considerations
- Re (2): Labels and Status
- Re: DeltaV doesn't support a true client workspace
- RE: Complexity and Core Considerations
- Re: Clarification of working-resource option description
- Re: Complexity and Core Considerations
- RE: Complexity and Core Considerations
- Re: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 2/2/00 (Friday) 12-1pm EST
- Clarification of working-resource option description
- RE: DeltaV doesn't support a true client workspace
- Complexity and Core Considerations
Friday, 2 February 2001
- FW: DeltaV Passthrough issues
- RE: CHECKIN and properties
- RE: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 2/2/00 (Friday) 12-1pm EST
- RE: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 2/2/00 (Friday) 12-1pm EST
- RE: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 2/2/00 (Friday) 12-1pm EST
- RE: Core versioning issues and nits
- RE: Core versioning issues and nits
- RE: Core versioning issues and nits
- RE: Core versioning issues and nits
- RE: Core versioning issues and nits
- RE: Core versioning issues and nits
- RE: Core versioning issues and nits
- RE: Core versioning issues and nits
- RE: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 2/2/00 (Friday) 12-1pm EST
- Re: Patches
- RE: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 2/2/00 (Friday) 12-1pm EST
- RE: Labels and Status
- From Juergen Reuter
- Re: Labels and Status
- Re: Labels and Status
- Re: Labels and Status
- RE: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 2/2/00 (Friday) 12-1pm EST
- Re: Labels and Status
- Labels and Status
- Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 2/2/00 (Friday) 12-1pm EST
- Re: remove DAV:version property?
- Re: Introduction
- Re: Terms
- RE: Comments on -12: properties, REPORT, OPTIONS
- Re: Core versioning issues and nits
- Re: Comments on VERSION-CONTROL
- Re: Extensibility for all DeltaV methods
- Re: PROPFIND, VCRs, Label, Depth, href ... oh my!
- Move and copy, versioning and overwrite interactions
- Introduction
- Re: PROPFIND, VCRs, Label, Depth, href ... oh my!
- Terms
- Comment on Version 12.1 of the DeltaV Protocol
- Core versioning issues and nits
- Re: Extensibility for all DeltaV methods
- Re: Patches
- Comments on VERSION-CONTROL
Thursday, 1 February 2001
- RE: Comments on -12: properties, REPORT, OPTIONS
- Re: Patches
- Extensibility for all DeltaV methods
- Re: Comments on -12: properties, REPORT, OPTIONS
- PROPFIND, VCRs, Label, Depth, href ... oh my!
- CHECKIN and properties
- Section 2.1.1 comments
Wednesday, 31 January 2001
Tuesday, 30 January 2001
Monday, 29 January 2001
Sunday, 28 January 2001
Friday, 26 January 2001
- Re: expand-property report (was: Re: remove DAV:version property?)
- Re: "baseline selector" => "version-controlled configuration"
- Re: expand-property report (was: Re: remove DAV:version property?)
- Re: remove DAV:version property?
- expand-property report (was: Re: remove DAV:version property?)
- RE: remove DAV:version property?
Thursday, 25 January 2001
- Only one more week for the DeltaV Working Group last call!
- Re: remove DAV:version property?
- Re: remove DAV:version property?
- Re: remove DAV:version property?
- RE: comment
- Re: remove DAV:version property?
- Re: "baseline selector" => "version-controlled configuration"
- remove DAV:version property?
- "baseline selector" => "version-controlled configuration"
- Re: comment
- Re: comment
- RE: comment
- RE: DELETE variant
- RE: Comments
- RE: comment
- RE: Missing preconditions?
Wednesday, 24 January 2001
Tuesday, 23 January 2001
- Re: comment
- RE: comment
- DAV:comment
- [ANN] Delta-V FAQ
- Missing preconditions?
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-12.txt
- DELETE variant
Monday, 22 January 2001
Saturday, 20 January 2001
Friday, 19 January 2001
- Re: DeltaV Draft
- Re: 11.1 review
- CHECKOUT Location header
- version-history-collection-set
- DELETE semantics
- Re: reformatting the DAV:version-tree report
- testing in a workspace
- Re: replacing DAV:checkin-date with DAV:creationdate
- DAV:checked-in
- Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 1/19/00 (Friday) 12-1pm EST
- draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-11.3 now available
- RE: DeltaV Draft
Thursday, 18 January 2001
- Re: proppatch label-name-set?
- Re: DAV:version-controlled-binding-set
- Re: DAV:version-controlled-binding-set
- Re: replacing DAV:checkin-date with DAV:creationdate
- reformatting the DAV:version-tree report
- DAV:version-controlled-binding-set
- replacing DAV:checkin-date with DAV:creationdate
- Re: proppatch label-name-set?
- Re: fetching from a baseline on a readonly server
- Re: fetching from a baseline on a readonly server
- Re: 11.1 review
- New XML Media Types RFC
- Re: Editorial suggestions for DeltaV 11.2
- Re: DeltaV doesn't support a true client workspace
- Re: Editorial suggestions for DeltaV 11.2
- Re: DeltaV Draft
- Re: DeltaV Draft
Wednesday, 17 January 2001
- Editorial suggestions for DeltaV 11.2
- DeltaV doesn't support a true client workspace
- 11.1 review
- Re: fetching from a baseline on a readonly server
- MS Web Folders limits length of DAV header
- Re: fetching from a baseline on a readonly server
- Re: DeltaV Draft
- RE: DeltaV Draft
- Re: fetching from a baseline on a readonly server
Tuesday, 16 January 2001
- fetching from a baseline on a readonly server
- Re: is this example valid?
- Re: is this example valid?
- Re: is this example valid?
- Re: is this example valid?
- Re: is this example valid?
- Re: proppatch label-name-set?
- proppatch label-name-set?
- 11.1 review (teaser)
- Re: Re (4): collection version resources
- Re: is this example valid?
- Re: Re (4): collection version resources
- Re: DeltaV Draft
- is this example valid?
- Re: Re (4): collection version resources
- Re: Re (4): collection version resources
- Re: Re (4): collection version resources
- Re: DeltaV Draft
- Re: Re (4): collection version resources
- Re: Re (4): collection version resources
- Re: DeltaV Draft
- RE: DeltaV Draft
- Re: Re (4): collection version resources
- Re: Re (4): collection version resources
- RE: DeltaV Draft
- Re: Re (4): collection version resources
- Re (4): collection version resources
Monday, 15 January 2001
Sunday, 14 January 2001
Saturday, 13 January 2001
Friday, 12 January 2001
- RE: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 1/18/00 (Friday) 12-1pm EST
- draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-11.2 now available
- Re: Mail never hit list
- Re: "working-resource" vs. "client-workspace" option (was: Mail never hit list)
- "working-resource" vs. "client-workspace" option (was: Mail never hit list)
- Mail never hit list
- Re: auto-version
- Re: auto-version
Thursday, 11 January 2001
- RE: auto-version
- Re: auto-version
- "true" vs "DAV:true" (was: auto-version)
- Re: auto-version
- RE: auto-version
- Re: auto-version
- RE: auto-version
- RE: auto-version
- RE: auto-version
- DAV:auto-version
Wednesday, 10 January 2001
- draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-11.1 now available
- Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 1/18/00 (Friday) 12-1pm EST
- adding a DAV:namespace attribute for DAV:supported-xxx
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-11.txt
Monday, 8 January 2001
- RE: draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-11 now available
- draft-ietf-deltav-versioning-11 now available
- Re (3): Basic resource lifecycle: a proposal for "mutable versions"
- Re: Changes to DeltaV
- Re: re-use of version URL's (continued)
- Re: Changes to DeltaV
- Re: re-use of version URL's (continued)
- RE: re-use of version URL's (continued)
- RE: Changes to DeltaV
- A quick note about in-line comments
- Re: Re (2): Basic resource lifecycle: a proposal for "mutable versions"
- Re: Variant Control: a new proposal for handling "mutable version s"
Sunday, 7 January 2001
- RE: Variant Control: a new proposal for handling "mutable version s"
- Re (2): Basic resource lifecycle: a proposal for "mutable versions"
- [OT] SVN copy issue (was: Re: DAV:precursor-set)
- RE: Variant Control: a new proposal for handling "mutable version s"
- Re: DAV:precursor-set (was: Re: collection version resources)
- Re: Basic resource lifecycle: a new proposal for handling "mutable versions"
- DAV:precursor-set (was: Re: collection version resources)
- RE: Basic resource lifecycle: a new proposal for handling "mutable versions"
Saturday, 6 January 2001
- Basic resource lifecycle: a new proposal for handling "mutable versions"
- Re: Mutable Versions
- Variant Control: a new proposal for handling "mutable versions"
- Re: Nits on merge-response definition
- Nits on merge-response definition
- Re: Mutable Versions (was: re-use of version URL's)
- RE: Mutable Versions (was: re-use of version URL's)
Friday, 5 January 2001
- Re: Mutable Versions (was: re-use of version URL's)
- Re: re-use of version URL's
- Re: Core versioning scenario and mutability
- Re: Core versioning scenario and mutability
- Re: Core versioning scenario and mutability
- RE: Mutable Versions (was: re-use of version URL's)
- Core versioning scenario and mutability
- Re: Mutable Versions (was: re-use of version URL's)
- RE: Mutable Versions (was: re-use of version URL's)
- Mutable Versions (was: re-use of version URL's)
- Re: Changes to DeltaV
- Re: CHECKOUT of a baseline
- Re: CHECKOUT of a baseline
- Re: CHECKOUT of a baseline
- Re: CHECKOUT of a baseline
- Re: CHECKOUT of a baseline
- Re: Changes to DeltaV
- Re: re-use of version URL's
- Re: re-use of version URL's
- RE: re-use of version URL's
- RE: re-use of version URL's
- Re: re-use of version URL's
- RE: re-use of version URL's
- Changes to DeltaV
Thursday, 4 January 2001
- Re: re-use of version URL's
- RE: re-use of version URL's
- Re: re-use of version URL's
- Re: re-use of version URL's
- Re: re-use of version URL's
- Re: CHECKOUT of a baseline
- Re: CHECKOUT of a baseline
- Re: re-use of version URL's
- RE: re-use of version URL's
- RE: re-use of version URL's
- Re: Re (3): collection version resources
- Re: re-use of version URL's
- Re: re-use of version URL's
- RE: re-use of version URL's [was: some comments from Chris Kaler ...]
- Re: Re (3): collection version resources
- Re (3): collection version resources
- RE: re-use of version URL's [was: some comments from Chris Kaler ...]
- CHECKOUT of a baseline
Wednesday, 3 January 2001
- RE: re-use of version URL's [was: some comments from Chris Kaler ...]
- re-use of version URL's [was: some comments from Chris Kaler ...]
- RE: some comments from Chris Kaler on the versioning draft