- From: <Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 17:01:01 -0500
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
- Cc: Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de
> Yes, I was thinking "immutable", but sometimes wrote "ismutable". > Sorry about that! (Don't you hate it when people post things without > proofreading them? :-) Yes I hate it terribly. Sometimes I also have to hate myself :-) > I don't understand. I don't want to make a "human meaningful name" > immutable. I just want to make a version immutable. I didn't want > to say anything about the topic of meaningful names. That's > another matter. > But the people that have been lobbying for mutable versions and "reuse > of version URL's" (Mark and Lisa) want them to have human meaningful > names. So a solution needs to deal with both issues. I agree. I even thought about adding some ideas on this additional problem to my proposal but it was too late in the evening and I thought it could stand alone. It seems I was wrong. So stay tuned. Probably tomorrow evening (It's too late now again) I will write an expanded proposal. At least in case that my rough ideas work out. Thanks for your explanations. I think that I now understand what you see as problems. Cheers, Edgar P.S. So you see that I don't accept variant-control yet :-) -- edgar@edgarschwarz.de http://www.edgarschwarz.de * DOSenfreie Zone. Running Native Oberon. * Make it as simple as possible, but not simpler. Albert Einstein
Received on Monday, 8 January 2001 17:01:02 UTC