- From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 12:07:35 -0800
- To: <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
- Cc: <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>, "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@xythos.com>, <jjh@allerton.de>, <gstein@lyra.org>, <Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de>, <CFay@filenet.com>, <mark.hale@interwoven.com>
During the conference call this coming Friday, the top item for discussion will be whether the document is currently in a sufficiently stable form that it should be sent along to the IESG for IETF-wide last call, and review by the Application Area Director(s). One of the most critical pieces of information I need to determine whether I personally believe the draft should go forward is a good sense of how many people have reviewed the *entire* specification, including all options. During the last call, I was only able to review the core capabilities, and some of checkin/checkout, and this took me a day. So, if you have reviewed the options part of the specification, please answer the straw poll question below. Please indicate which options you have reviewed. Geoff, I'll automatically assume you have reviewed the entire document :-) If I've cc'ed you on this email, that means you appear to have done a thorough recent review, and are likely to have reviewed one or more options. Hence, especially if I have cc'ed you, I would appreciate a straw poll response. Poll responses to the list are preferred. 1. Have you reviewed all options in the DeltaV protocol specification (Yes/No). 2. If no, which options have you reviewed? 3. If you have implementation experience for one or more options, and can share this experience, which options have you implemented? Please reply by Friday morning, 7AM, US Pacific time. Thank you! - Jim
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2001 15:08:26 UTC