- From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 13:35:24 -0800
- To: <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
> The first question is just an editorial question. I would prefer to > keep the versioning protocol as one document -- after all, when the > first paragraph of the introductions says: > > "An implementor that is only interested in core versioning should read > Section I (Introduction), Section II (Core Versioning), and Section > 15 (Report Option)." > > is a reader really all that likely to be confused? Yes, because in order to implement core, you also need to read, understand, and subset the information in the security considerations, i18n, IANA considerations, references, as well as understand and implement the error reporting extensions listed in the appendix, so you can properly report errors from VERSION-CONTROL. And these are just the ones I can list from memory. Plus, a core-only document would have a shorter introduction, and a shorter definitions section, making it ever so easier to understand. A core-only document would also appear much less intimidating, since, if printed double-sided, you could make a working paper airplane out the stack of papers. :-) - Jim
Received on Sunday, 4 February 2001 16:36:04 UTC