Re: Extensibility for all DeltaV methods

Sounds gratuitous to me, but I don't object.

Regards,

Tim


"Geoffrey M. Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com> on 2001-02-02 03:59:24 AM

Please respond to "Geoffrey M. Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com>

To:   ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
cc:
Subject:  Re: Extensibility for all DeltaV methods





   From: "Vasta, John" <jvasta@rational.com>

   DeltaV methods which take request bodies are extensible, in that the
DTDs
   for the top-level element in the body are all declared to allow ANY
   sub-elements. However, there are three methods which are not defined to
take
   request bodies: MKACTIVITY, MKWORKSPACE, and UNCHECKOUT. Should the
protocol
   explicitly declare that they can be extended by defining request bodies
for
   them?

Sounds reasonable to me.  Any objections?

Cheers,
Geoff

Received on Friday, 2 February 2001 05:31:48 UTC