Re: Comments on -12: properties, REPORT, OPTIONS

• From: Geoffrey M. Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com>
• Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 22:55:35 -0500 (EST)
• To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
• Message-Id: <200102050355.WAA20109@tantalum.atria.com>

   From: "Jim Whitehead" <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>

   > > 4) What are the semantics if there is an XML request body
   > > for OPTIONS, and this request body does not include a
   > > DAV:supported-method-set, DAV:supported-live-property-set,
   > > or DAV:supported-report-set at all (i.e., what happens if
   > > one or more are just plain omitted)?
   >
   > Then the corresponding response elements are 'just plain omitted'.

   That makes sense, but it should be specified.  Another perfectly
   reasonable response is to flag the input as a syntax error, since
   it's missing an expected XML element, and this could cause
   interoperability problems.

Now that these are back to being properties, the question no longer
arises.

Cheers,
Geoff

Received on Sunday, 4 February 2001 22:56:33 UTC