- From: <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:15:25 +0000
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
I agree with Greg that simpler uses of workspace are feasible. Tim Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> on 2001-01-16 05:42:04 AM Please respond to Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org cc: Subject: Re: Re (4): collection version resources On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 08:01:11PM -0500, Geoffrey M. Clemm wrote: >... > But this does raise a good point wrt the "workspace option". Workspaces > are designed so that "baselining" and "merging" would be unambiguous. > Which means that there is not much point implementing workspaces if > you are not implementing baselining or merging. > > I'm tempted to suggest that we define the workspace option as implying > support for both the "baseline option" and the "merge option". Does > anyone object? I could create a workspace, populate it, checkout a resource, modify it, then check it back in. Maybe hop over to the "public" VCR and update it. Who says that I need baselines or merging? So, I'd say "I object" until there appears to be a good reason for requiring one or the other. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2001 04:16:16 UTC