- From: Geoffrey M. Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 21:40:00 -0500 (EST)
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
From: Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com > ... What I was driving at was, if the server > signals that it does support the activity option, does that then > mean the server MUST allow writing to DAV:current-activity-set via > PROPPATCH? I claim "yes" -- that's what supporting the activity option means (plus the other stuff<g>). I agree (unless prevented by access control, locking, and other things that might prevent you from writing to something that is writeable). Cheers, Geoff
Received on Sunday, 4 February 2001 21:40:59 UTC