- From: <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:53:50 +0000
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
<tim> 2.9 Additional DELETE semantics (DAV:update-predecessor-set) I presume this is to prevent "holes" in the history, but this won't work in the face of merges. </tim> <geoff/>Why not? Now I've thought about it again, I retract this one. Tim
Received on Friday, 19 January 2001 04:56:24 UTC