- From: <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>
 - Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:53:50 +0000
 - To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
 
<tim>
   2.9 Additional DELETE semantics
       (DAV:update-predecessor-set)
       I presume this is to prevent "holes" in the history, but this won't
work
   in the face of merges.
</tim>
<geoff/>Why not?
Now I've thought about it again, I retract this one.
Tim
Received on Friday, 19 January 2001 04:56:24 UTC