- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 18:44:59 -0800
- To: <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
> > [Lisa] > > However, the real showstopper is the lack of resource > > transparency. Global properties, like "author" from Dublin > > Core, or "Editor-in-Chief", are hidden away in VHRs. That > > means that versioning-unaware clients cannot interoperate > > with versioning clients on the same set of documents. They > > can't even PROPFIND a set of VCRs to get properties which > > ought to exist. > > [Tim] > I don't have any suggestions for you here since there is no > property that > has the characteristic of being defined on a set of resources > in this way. > all I can offer is that the version history resource has a > URL that the > versioning unaware client can use to PROPFIND/PROPPATCH dead > properties -- > but that would not be the same URL as any version-controlled resource > (which is what I think you are asking for). > Yes, that's what I'm asking for. Although it's true that the VHR has a URL that a versioning-unaware client could hypothetically use, this is actually useless since a versioning-unaware client cannot get the URL of the VHR; it doesn't even know it's supposed to look on VHRs for that property. The functionality of having what I call "global" properties on VCRs is a requirement for many document versioning scenarios. Lisa
Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2001 21:45:57 UTC