- From: <Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de>
- Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 17:20:37 -0500
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
- Cc: Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de
"Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@xythos.com> wrote: > Yes, many versioning systems have "status" properties on versions, and > the "status" property should be mutable, i.e. should be writable without > creating a new version. snip > Thus, versioning needs a general way to allow creation of custom > properties which are mutable, AND custom properties which are immutable. > The server would of course reject requests for mutable properties if it > does not support mutability, but we need a standard way for clients to > ask for this. I saw no reply to that yet so I will give my $0.02. I think a mutable status property is essential if I want to do some document management. To be more flexible I also would want to to have at least arbitrary mutable properties to add to a version. Or can I mimic that by adding multiple labels to a version ? E.g. doc#1 status_accepted, author_edgar doc#2 status_working, author_lisa (sometimes authors of documents change) Cheers, Edgar -- edgar@edgarschwarz.de http://www.edgarschwarz.de * DOSenfreie Zone. Running Native Oberon. * Make it as simple as possible, but not simpler. Albert Einstein
Received on Saturday, 3 February 2001 17:20:42 UTC