- From: Vasta, John <jvasta@rational.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:47:49 -0500
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
On Thursday, February 08, 2001 3:59 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > But let's look at some of the stated/implied/inferred implementations: > > Rational: nothing stated publicly :-), but they're doing a > bunch of options Actually, a recent message from Geoff stated that we're implementing all but Working Resources and Variants, and Fork-Control will probably miss the cut for an initial implementation. (We can add Working Resources and Variants some day, if there ends up being demand for those options from clients.) I would like to add my vote for keeping the document as is (not splitting it). It is very important to have a stable specification for these options as soon as possible. My sense from the traffic on this list is that the vast majority of server implementors are planning on implementing at least some of the options. Letting the status of the options specifications lag behind the core specification will impede the availability and interoperability of a number of implementations. John
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2001 12:40:04 UTC