- From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:36:13 -0800
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:21:12AM -0500, Geoffrey M. Clemm wrote: > > From: "Boris Bokowski/OTT/OTI" <Boris_Bokowski@oti.com> > Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 09:40:18 -0500 > > > Add a DAV:baseline-collection property on a baseline, which holds > > a DAV:href containing a server-defined URL. This URL identifies > > a read-only collection that exposes that baseline as a collection. > > > > ... > > > > So, everyone else: any objections? (For Greg at least, I presume, no :-). No objections here, boss. How'd you guess? :-) >... > Also note that this property allows us to get rid of the > DAV:baseline-version-set property, since you can get the same > information by doing a PROPFIND for the DAV:checked-in values in this > collection. Yes, I'd prefer to see that nuked. As you point out later, it scales poorly and it has little utility anyways. Somebody mentioned "four implementations" of DeltaV that were occurring. Have we seen feature sets from any of these other three? I'd be interested in what others are implementing. (to consider interop) Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Thursday, 18 January 2001 15:35:29 UTC