- From: <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:41:27 +0000
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
I began reading this with one assumption, then understood what Greg meant part way through, so the first couple of comments no longer apply. Scratch those I wrote below, and sorry for the (my) confusion. Tim > > For VCRs that are under baseline control, I propose that > > we add a new property that specifies their relative path > > to the "root" of the baseline, where the root is defined > > by the baseline's DAV:baseline-collection property. > > I assume that you are referring to the checked-in VCRs in the > DAV:baseline-collection. No dumbo, that wouldn't be too difficult! > > [ hmm. just noticed something: that property assumes the > > baseline is not disjoint. fixing that is "out of scope" > > of this message :-) ] > > I'll watch for the other message, I don't know what you mean. This comment still stands. > > Without the property mentioned above, it would be very > > difficult to figure out where to go in a baseline to > > find the matching resource. > > What does 'where to go in a baseline' mean? > Can I assume you mean the DAV:baseline-collection? I still think 'where to go in a baseline' is a strange expression, but I know what you mean now<g> Tim
Received on Friday, 16 February 2001 08:42:29 UTC