- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 16:06:27 -0800
- To: "Geoffrey M. Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
I think I agree with Mark and will try to clarify for him... > In particular, you have a cheap way of guaranteeing unique version > url's by tacking a uuid to the end of the implementation name of > the object in your store. This gives you a stable name for a version. > In addition, you have human meaningful names for versions, by > combining version-controlled resource URL's with version names and > labels. So it looks the protocol gives you both stable names for > versions and human meaningful names for versions. Yes, you get stable URLs (names) for versions. Yes, you get human meaningful names, but only really for version-controlled resources. The phrase "human meaningful" is probably where the disconnect is. If you consider the following human-meaningful, then you're right. But I suspect Mark doesn't consider the following particularly usable. http://www.server.com/version-space/path/filename.ext/version2/UUID10938 478691283 Lisa
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2001 19:07:48 UTC