- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 22:36:14 -0500
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
OK, that's 2-1, so URLs it is (:-). Cheers, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Greg Stein [mailto:gstein@lyra.org] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 9:36 PM To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org Subject: Re: minor comments regarding 12.2 On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 09:22:44PM -0500, Geoffrey M. Clemm wrote: >... > section 10.2.2 > URLs > > That's always a hard call. I have consistently used "URL's" instead > of "URLs" in the document, since URLs can sometimes be confused as > a four letter acronym. I could change this if anyone cares enough > to support this change request (otherwise it's just 1-1, and the author > wins all tied trivial formatting issues :-). I tend to use URLs. The 's form always means "possessive" to me, rather than "plural". In this context, I doubt that URLs will be ambiguous with some four letter acronum. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Friday, 9 February 2001 22:28:13 UTC