- From: Geoffrey M. Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com>
- Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 09:32:33 -0500 (EST)
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
OK, I think I've grok'ed what Lisa and Mark want here. Let me know what you think ... ------------------- First, let's rename "mutable versions". In particular, let's call them "variants". A reason for the rename is that a variant is *not* a special kind of version resource, but rather is a special kind of version-controlled resource. A version-controlled resource gets variants by putting it under "variant-control" (with a VARIANT-CONTROL request). When a version-controlled resource is under variant control, each time you checkin that version-controlled resource, you create a new "variant". A variant of a given version-controlled resource is another version-controlled resource (with a URL selected by the server) whose DAV:checked-in property always identifies some version of the given version-controlled resource. The variants of a version-controlled resource can be determined by looking at the DAV:variant-set property of the version-controlled resource. One interesting characteristic of a version-controlled resource under variant control is that a server MAY automatically delete any version of that version-controlled resource that is not currently identified by the DAV:checked-in or DAV:checked-out property of a variant of that variant-controlled resource. ------------------- OK, that's it. I believe this gives us all what we want. I believe the "variant URL" has all the properties that Lisa and Mark have requested (allocated by the server, but can identify different resources at different times), while still providing a DAV:checked-in property for clients that want to have a stable URL for a particular state of that variant. Comments? Cheers, Geoff
Received on Saturday, 6 January 2001 09:33:23 UTC