- From: Geoffrey M. Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 12:51:09 -0500 (EST)
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
From: Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com From Geoff: > Everyone else: Do you think that the Autoversion > header for PUT is of sufficient value to be worth > putting into core? It is a way for a versioning > client to interact with a server like Chuck's > without forcing his server to have every PUT to > a version-controlled resource result in a new > version. No, please no more alternatives for, or combinations of, existing functionality. Tim makes a good point. Since folks are already concerned about complexity and the number of options, we need to be very stringent about requiring a high level of demonstrated need and support for any new option or additional variation in an existing option. Cheers, Geoff
Received on Monday, 5 February 2001 12:52:14 UTC