- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:27:23 -0800
- To: <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
> Just to be pedantic for a minute, if the client was totally versioning > unaware then they would be unaware that versions of the > resource exist, or > the need for "global" properties. A versioning unaware > client would set a > dead property on an autoversioned version-controlled > resource, and that > would be carried forward through subsequent versions of the resource. But they would be aware of the need for a property like "Editor-in-Chief", they may need to get or set the value of this property. > Ok, so if a client was, say, versioning aware (i.e., knows > versions exist) > but versioning challenged<g> (i.e., cannot make versioning > calls) then they > could query the DAV:version-history property of the VCR > (using PROPFIND) to > get to the version history resource and set properties there (using > PROPPATCH). It would not require any versioning specific methods to > implement the "global" properties. But they would also potentially know about the property "Editor-in-Chief". And the versioning-aware client can look at past versions, where the "Editor-in-Chief" property really should not have a different value. So how are the two clients supposed to use the same property interoperably? Lisa
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2001 12:29:05 UTC