public-tracking@w3.org from February 2012 by subject

[Action-106][Issue-32] Sharing of data between entities via cookie syncing / identity brokering

[Action-40] Draft user defn language

[ACTION-48] Re-phrase 3.6.1.2.1

[comment] Names and Titles of specifications

[Issue-5] [Action-77] Defining Tunnel-Vision 'Do Not (Cross-Site) Track'

[Issue-5][Action-78] Remember to forget me

[Issue-71] Proposed Text for Issue 71

ACTION 100: machine readable lists Amy, Joanne and Kevin

ACTION 124

Action 74, Do Not Create A Profile

Action 93

Action-101: Revise text for Issue-6, What are the underlying concerns?

Action-101; language for issue-6 for TCS spec

ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119)

ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header.

ACTION-115: Write up counter-proposal to header with well-known URI

ACTION-122, ISSUE-125: Pro-actively requesting exceptions

ACTION-130 Call for use cases

ACTION-133 collect comparison criteria

ACTION-44: Also write additional examples around branding for first parties by next week

ACTION-49: Propose what the operational carve-outs for 3.6.1.2.1 (e.g. debugging by 3rd party) are

ACTION-52: Propose specific text for ISSUE-35, ISSUE-52, ISSUE-53, ISSUE-57, ISSUE-58

ACTION-61 ISSUE-45

ACTION-69: Renaming ISSUE-54

ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track

ACTION-84: Wiley to describe the reason for setting DNT=null

ACTION-86: Write a clarification of dnt:c to apply to never-tracked resources

Action-91: Write text on fingerprinting risk (ISSUE-109, ISSUE-114), with Nick Doty

ACTION-95, ISSUE-118: asynchronous version of site-specific exception API

ACTION-98: Bring input on ISSUE-111 to the group; otherwise it's closed

Action-99, Write up automated discoverability of party relationships proposal; also action-80

Advancing the W3C's Overall Agenda

Agenda for 2012-02-01 call (V02: added more incoming issues with text)

Agenda for 2012-Feb-14 call

Agenda for 2012-Feb-22 call

Agenda for 2012-Feb-29 call

Agenda for 2012-Feb-8 call

Browser Implementation of DNT: Opera

DAA and add browser-based header signals

DAA Statement on DNT ("Broswer [sic] Based Choice Mechanism")

DC face-to-face: poll closing tomorrow

Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49)

DNT ad tag integration

DNT Compliance and Audit Services (ACTION-56, ISSUE-21)

DNT mobile

DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84)

DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85)

DNT-aware JavaScript (ISSUE-84, ACTION-85, ACTION-111)

EU regulators want Google to halt new privacy policy | Firstpost

Fate-sharing for ad behavioral targeting and other forms of personalization (ISSUE-36)

Housekeeping from today's call

Initial feedback on the well-known URI Proposal

Issue 115, exemptions, best practices

Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34

Issue 25: Possible exemption for research purposes covered by conditions for outsourcing and issue 34: Exemption for aggregated data

Issue 74: Are surveys out of scope & Issue 34: Exemption for aggregated data

Issue-10 housekeeping (was Re: technical, business, legal definitions)

ISSUE-106: Responses on cached objects

Issue-107, Issue-120, Issue-124

ISSUE-121 Re: ACTION-84: Wiley to describe the reason for setting DNT=null

issue-122

ISSUE-33, ACTION-59: exemptions exposed to users

Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data

Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data, Action-67

Issue-5 - Cross Tracking Definition Proposal

Issue-65: How does logged in and logged out state work -- Draft Proposal

JS Exception API

Mandatory Legal Process (ACTION-57, ISSUE-28)

Minutes, minutes, every where

multi-stakeholder participation (was Re: Deciding Exceptions....)

New Research on Protocol Information (ISSUE-16, ISSUE-19)

Next f2f meeting: Doodle poll

PENDING REVIEW: Proposal to close a series of PENDING REVIEW Items

possible 'transient un-analyzed data exception'?

revised text for ISSUE-78

some information on what HTML5 uses 'user interaction' for

The DAA Commitment

Third parties should not pretend to be first parties

tracking-ISSUE-121: Should a user agent advertise its DNT ability by, e.g., sending DNT;NULL [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]

tracking-ISSUE-122: Should we have use limitations on referrer data? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]

tracking-ISSUE-123: Third parties should be prohibited from acting or representing themselves as first parties. [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]

tracking-ISSUE-124: Alternative DNT implementations that replace HTTP headers with something else [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]

tracking-ISSUE-125: Way to test if a given user agent supports DNT [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]

tracking-ISSUE-126: DNT-extension syntax includes characters not safe to embed in JSON [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]

tracking-ISSUE-127: Comparison of well-known URI and response headers: Pro's and Con's of both? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)]

White House event

who are we protecting against? is it 'bad actors'?

Last message date: Wednesday, 29 February 2012 23:51:39 UTC