My intent here is simply to understand the new position adopted by the DAA and other stakeholders in this group. (There is some language in the statement that I and others don't quite follow.) I do not want to open a forum for grievances about that position. Jonathan On Feb 23, 2012, at 2:02 AM, Jeffrey Chester wrote: > Point 1 suggests users will be first talked out of exercising their choice, and given misleading information about the nature of profile-based tracking. > > Jeff Chester > Center for Digital Democracy > Washington DC > www.democraticmedia.org > Jeff@democraticmedia.org > > On Feb 23, 2012, at 2:47 AM, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu> wrote: > >> http://www.aboutads.info/resource/download/DAA_Committment.pdf >> >> If I read this correctly, the DAA's new position on DNT is: >> >> 1) Substantively, the same as the current DAA program, plus >> 2) no browser or network intermediary can enable DNT by default (ISSUE-4, ISSUE-95), and >> 3) language in the browser UI has to be clear that the feature doesn't prohibit all data collection (ISSUE-41). >> >> Is that right? >> >> Thanks, >> Jonathan >>
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 13:55:35 UTC