Re: Issue 115, exemptions, best practices: Issue 25 and 34 from John Simpson on 2012-02-13 (public-tracking@w3.org from February 2012)

From: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:33:50 -0800
To: Lauren Gelman <gelman@blurryedge.com>
Cc: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>, Jeffrey Chester <jeff@democraticmedia.org>, Lee Tien <tien@eff.org>, "Amy Colando (LCA)" <acolando@microsoft.com>, Kathy Joe <K.Joe@esomar.org>, Jules Polonetsky <julespol@futureofprivacy.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, "adam.phillips@realresearch.co.uk" <adam.phillips@realresearch.co.uk>
Message-Id: <09A38F26-19C6-49A0-A914-6892C323689E@consumerwatchdog.org>

Alan,

Isn't Chris Pedigo of the Online Publishers Association a member of the group?

Hasn't the Nick Doty, of the W3C, explicitly suggested ways for more publisher involvement and offered to reach out bring more publishers in?

John


On Feb 13, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Lauren Gelman wrote:

>> Moreover, can you provide some evidence to back up the claim that it is a reasonable expectation for publishers to have a group with almost zero direct input from the publisher community dictate the terms of their interactions with their visitors?

----------
John M. Simpson
Consumer Advocate
Consumer Watchdog
1750 Ocean Park Blvd. ,Suite 200
Santa Monica, CA,90405
Tel: 310-392-7041
Cell: 310-292-1902
www.ConsumerWatchdog.org
john@consumerwatchdog.org

Received on Monday, 13 February 2012 20:34:11 UTC