W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > February 2012

Re: ACTION-130 Call for use cases

From: Kevin Trilli <ktrilli@truste.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:05:22 -0800
To: Matthias Schunter <mts@zurich.ibm.com>
CC: "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <206F05E8-67D8-44D6-9198-8D12D6D55338@truste.com>
Matthias:

I had put some similar thoughts into this response to the revised response header thread in case it got buried:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Feb/0193.html

Kevin


On Feb 24, 2012, at 3:15 AM, Matthias Schunter wrote:

Hi Folks,

I created a table in the W3C Wiki to start comparing both approaches:
http://www.w3.org/wiki/DntResponseHeaderOrURI

Feel free to correct, augment, improve my initial (likely to be
subjective) assessment.

Regards,
matthias


On 2/23/2012 8:04 PM, Matthias Schunter wrote:
Hi Team,


in order to differentiate the advantages and disadvantages of our two
feedback mechanisms:
- Feedback via well-known URI
- Feedback via response header

We decided to collect use cases to 'benchmark' both solutions.

Please respond to this note with your proposed use cases. I will then
summarize them.


Reagards,
matthias
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 17:05:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:45 UTC