W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49)

From: Jeffrey Chester <jeff@democraticmedia.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:03:07 -0500
Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
Message-id: <F7D30275-ACE0-4B0D-B43A-B1BACB1CA26E@democraticmedia.org>
To: Matthias Schunter <mts@zurich.ibm.com>
Regulators in both US and EU now say that its both collection and use that's the problem.  The US regulators understand that the industry has implemented a wide-ranging first+third party data collection system (ad exchanges are good example of this).  We will see greater focus on collection in regulatory policy debates.  





Jeffrey Chester
Center for Digital Democracy
1621 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 550
Washington, DC 20009
www.democraticmedia.org
www.digitalads.org
202-986-2220

On Feb 9, 2012, at 5:50 PM, Matthias Schunter wrote:

> Hi Team,
> 
> for DNT-related data,  Roy's assessment of the key regulatory concerns
> matches my experience
> 
> Regards,
> matthias
> 
> On 2/9/2012 10:49 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>> Judging from my personal discussions with regulators, I would not
>> say that data collection constraints are a significant concern.
>> Data sharing (on purpose or by failure to handle it properly) is
>> the primary concern.  Data retention beyond that necessary to
>> support user-consented operational uses, or in a form that is
>> unnecessary to support operational uses, is a concern.
>> Obtaining specific and informed consent is a concern.
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 23:03:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:45 UTC