W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > February 2012

Re: ACTION-110: Write proposal text for what it means to "not track" (ISSUE-119)

From: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:07:32 -0800
Message-Id: <85CB84F1-9ABD-4150-BC90-47795313AAF9@consumerwatchdog.org>
Cc: "(public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Seems like a reasonable defi ition

On Feb 22, 2012, at 4:06 PM, David Singer wrote:

> I think it is easier to define 'tracking', than to define 'not tracking'.  The definition does not need to include all the exceptions: they are better described individually, with their constraints, definition, and so on, in separate text.
> 
> Here is a simple definition:
> 
> "Tracking is the retention or use, after a transaction is complete, of data records that are, or can be, associated with a single user."
> 
> This knocks out aggregate non-individual counts, and doesn't consider in-transaction data while the transaction is in process (between request and response).
> 
> 
> David Singer
> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
> 

----------
John M. Simpson
Consumer Advocate
Consumer Watchdog
1750 Ocean Park Blvd. ,Suite 200
Santa Monica, CA,90405
Tel: 310-392-7041
Cell: 310-292-1902
www.ConsumerWatchdog.org
john@consumerwatchdog.org
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 02:07:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:25 UTC