Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49)

Even if this is true, retention would have to be closer to 18 hours than 18 months, right?

On Feb 9, 2012, at 3:18 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:

> In most cases however, I believe that ‘collection’ in these instances more closely matches the term ‘retention’ as Jonathon has defined them.
>  
> From: Jeffrey Chester [mailto:jeff@democraticmedia.org] 
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 4:03 PM
> To: Matthias Schunter
> Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49)
>  
> Regulators in both US and EU now say that its both collection and use that's the problem.  The US regulators understand that the industry has implemented a wide-ranging first+third party data collection system (ad exchanges are good example of this).  We will see greater focus on collection in regulatory policy debates.  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Jeffrey Chester
> Center for Digital Democracy
> 1621 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 550
> Washington, DC 20009
> www.democraticmedia.org
> www.digitalads.org
> 202-986-2220
>  
> On Feb 9, 2012, at 5:50 PM, Matthias Schunter wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Team,
> 
> for DNT-related data,  Roy's assessment of the key regulatory concerns
> matches my experience
> 
> Regards,
> matthias
> 
> On 2/9/2012 10:49 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> 
> Judging from my personal discussions with regulators, I would not
> say that data collection constraints are a significant concern.
> Data sharing (on purpose or by failure to handle it properly) is
> the primary concern.  Data retention beyond that necessary to
> support user-consented operational uses, or in a form that is
> unnecessary to support operational uses, is a concern.
> Obtaining specific and informed consent is a concern.
> 
> 
> 
>  

Lauren Gelman
BlurryEdge Strategies
415-627-8512
gelman@blurryedge.com
http://blurryedge.com