Wednesday, 1 October 2003
Tuesday, 30 September 2003
Wednesday, 1 October 2003
- Agenda, 2 October 2003 WS Desc telcon
- RE: proposal for improving <documentation>
- [Corrected] Minutes, 24 Sept 2003 WS Desc WG FTF
Tuesday, 30 September 2003
- RE: IBM/MSFT whitepaper on secure, reliable, transacted Web se rv ices
- RE: Minutes, 24 Sept 2003 WS Desc WG FTF
- Re: Summary: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Desc FTF
- Re: proposal for faults
- Re: "Bulk load" get/set
- Re: proposal for faults
- Re: Summary: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Desc FTF
- proposal for faults
- Re: Summary: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Desc FTF
- Re: Summary: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Desc FTF
- Re: Summary: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Desc FTF
- Re: Summary: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Desc FTF
- Re: rationale for status quo for fault references?
- RPC style rules update in draft
- Re: Summary: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Desc FTF
- Re: "Bulk load" get/set
- RE: "Bulk load" get/set
- RE: "Bulk load" get/set
- Re: "Bulk load" get/set
- Withdrawal from Web services
- RE: "Bulk load" get/set
- Re: "Bulk load" get/set
- Re: Summary: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Desc FTF
- Re: Summary: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Desc FTF
- RE: IBM/MSFT whitepaper on secure, reliable, transacted Web se rv ices
- Re: "Bulk load" get/set
- RE: IBM/MSFT whitepaper on secure, reliable, transacted Web serv ices
- Re: Summary: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Desc FTF
- Re: "Bulk load" get/set
- RE: "Bulk load" get/set
- Re: new issue: drop {direction} property from message reference components
- Re: rationale for status quo for fault references?
- Re: IBM/MSFT whitepaper on secure, reliable, transacted Web services
- "Bulk load" get/set
- RE: Minutes, 24 Sept 2003 WS Desc WG FTF
- Re: rationale for status quo for fault references?
- Summary: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Desc FTF
- Minutes, 24 Sept 2003 WS Desc WG FTF
- Minutes, 23 Sept 2003 WS Desc WG FTF
- Minutes, 22 Sept 2003 WS Desc WG FTF
Monday, 29 September 2003
- Re: new issue: drop {direction} property from message reference components
- RE: IBM/MSFT whitepaper on secure, reliable, transacted Web serv ices
- RE: IBM/MSFT whitepaper on secure, reliable, transacted Web services
- Re: rationale for "message triggers fault" fault rule
- rationale for status quo for fault references?
- Re: rationale for "message triggers fault" fault rule
- Re: rationale for "message triggers fault" fault rule
- new issue: drop {direction} property from message reference components
- rationale for "message triggers fault" fault rule
- Re: request for explanatory wording for features
- Re: On WSDL "operation"
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- Re: On WSDL "operation"
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- Re: On WSDL "operation"
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- Re: On WSDL "operation"
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- FYI: IBM/MSFT whitepaper on secure, reliable, transacted Web services
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- Re: On WSDL "operation"
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- Re: On WSDL "operation"
Sunday, 28 September 2003
Friday, 26 September 2003
Wednesday, 24 September 2003
Tuesday, 23 September 2003
- Examples for Web service references presentation
- atf report
- updated ATF report
- Re: wsreferences presentation - 0.9 - no examples
- wsreferences presentation - 0.9 - no examples
- Re: proposal for shortcutting <operation> syntax for simple operation patterns
Monday, 22 September 2003
- Motivation for R131
- Re: proposal for shortcutting <operation> syntax for simple operation patterns
- Re: is the uniqueness constraint on top level components sufficient?
- proposal for shortcutting <operation> syntax for simple operation patterns
- Minutes of 18-Sep-2003 telcon
- Re: message exchange patterns and # of parties
- Re: @headers in input/output construct
- Re: request for explanatory wording for features
- RE: request for explanatory wording for features
Sunday, 21 September 2003
- proposal for simplifying interface extensions
- Re: struggling with operation and message patterns writeup in spec
- Re: Issue with binding message references in the abstract component model
- Re: Issue with binding message references in the abstract component model
- Re: Issue with binding message references in the abstract component model
- RE: request for explanatory wording for features
- RE: @headers in input/output construct
- RE: comments on Appendix E
- RE: Issue with binding message references in the abstract component model
- RE: struggling with operation and message patterns writeup in spec
Friday, 19 September 2003
- RE: is the uniqueness constraint on top level components sufficient?
- RE: is the uniqueness constraint on top level components sufficient?
- Re: is the uniqueness constraint on top level components sufficient?
- RE: is the uniqueness constraint on top level components sufficient?
- Re: is the uniqueness constraint on top level components sufficient?
- RE: is the uniqueness constraint on top level components sufficient?
- Re: is the uniqueness constraint on top level components sufficient?
- RE: is the uniqueness constraint on top level components sufficient?
- Re: struggling with operation and message patterns writeup in spec
- Re: is the uniqueness constraint on top level components sufficient?
- RE: is the uniqueness constraint on top level components sufficient?
- Re: message exchange patterns and # of parties
- Re: message exchange patterns and # of parties
- Re: struggling with operation and message patterns writeup in spec
- spec draft update
- Re: proposal for improving <documentation>
- is the uniqueness constraint on top level components sufficient?
Thursday, 18 September 2003
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- Re: message reference component & syntax
- FW: Draft minutes of 18-Sep-2003 telcon
- RE: proposal for improving <documentation>
- Re: proposal for improving <documentation>
- [3nd draft] Agenda: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Description WG FTF
- RE: proposal for improving <documentation>
- RE: message reference component & syntax
- Re: message exchange patterns and # of parties
- comments on Appendix E
- Re: [2nd draft] Agenda: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Description WG FTF
- Re: Normative rpc rules for encodingStyle attribute are missing i n Part 1
- FW: proposal for improving <documentation>
- RE: Normative rpc rules for encodingStyle attribute are missing i n Part 1
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- proposal for improving <documentation>
- request for explanatory wording for features
- Re: message reference component & syntax
- message reference component & syntax
- struggling with operation and message patterns writeup in spec
- RE: Draft Minutes 11 Sept 2003 WS Desc Telcon
- RE: Draft Minutes 11 Sept 2003 WS Desc Telcon
- Introduction
- RE: Agenda, 18 September 2003 WS Desc telcon
Wednesday, 17 September 2003
- Agenda, 18 September 2003 WS Desc telcon
- [2nd draft] Agenda: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Description WG FTF
- Re: Media types handling in WSDL 1.2
- RE: Updating WSDL Component Designators
- Re: On WSDL "operation"
- Re: Question on xsd:import
- Re: Question on xsd:import
- FW: Draft Minutes 11 Sept 2003 WS Desc Telcon
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- Re: Question on xsd:import
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- Re: Question on xsd:import
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- Re: Media types handling in WSDL 1.2
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- Re: Media types handling in WSDL 1.2
Tuesday, 16 September 2003
- Re: Question on xsd:import
- Re: On WSDL "operation"
- Re: Question on xsd:import
- Re: Normative rpc rules for encodingStyle attribute are missing in Part 1
- Re: Normative rpc rules for encodingStyle attribute are missing in Part 1
- Re: Question on xsd:import
- Re: Normative rpc rules for encodingStyle attribute are missing in Part 1
- Re: Question on xsd:import
- Re: On WSDL "operation"
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- Re: On WSDL "operation"
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- Re: On WSDL "operation"
- Media types handling in WSDL 1.2
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- RE: Question on xsd:import
- RE: On WSDL "operation"
- Re: On WSDL "operation"
- Normative rpc rules for encodingStyle attribute are missing in Part 1
- Re: On WSDL "operation"
- Re: On WSDL "operation"
- Question on xsd:import
Monday, 15 September 2003
- Re: On WSDL "operation"
- Issue with binding message references in the abstract component model
- RE: Updating WSDL Component Designators
- Updating WSDL Component Designators
- FW: QA WG Response to SpecGL comments
Friday, 12 September 2003
- RE: [draft] Agenda: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Description WG FTF
- Re: message exchange patterns and # of parties
- Re: message exchange patterns and # of parties
- Re: message exchange patterns and # of parties
- Re: message exchange patterns and # of parties
- Re: message exchange patterns and # of parties
- Re: [draft] Agenda: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Description WG FTF
- Re: [draft] Agenda: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Description WG FTF
- Re: message exchange patterns and # of parties
Thursday, 11 September 2003
- [draft] Agenda: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Description WG FTF
- Re: message exchange patterns and # of parties
- Re: message exchange patterns and # of parties
- RE: Recommendations from Patterns Task Force
- Re: message exchange patterns and # of parties
- Re: message exchange patterns and # of parties
- RE: Question Regarding Top Level Global Extensors
- Re: message exchange patterns and # of parties
- Re: On WSDL attributes
- Re: Introduction
- RE: On WSDL attributes
- Question Regarding Top Level Global Extensors
- Re: message exchange patterns and # of parties
Wednesday, 10 September 2003
- RE: On WSDL attributes
- Agenda, 11 September 2003 WS Desc telcon
- Re: query about /definitions/interface/operation/input etc.
- Re: On WSDL attributes
- RE: On WSDL attributes
- RE: On WSDL attributes
- query about /definitions/interface/operation/input etc.
- RE: Introduction
- Re: message exchange patterns and # of parties
- message exchange patterns and # of parties
- RE: Introduction
- RE: Introduction
- RE: Introduction
- Summary: the attribute formerly known as "name"
- Re: Introduction
- Re: Introduction
- Re: The attribute formerly known as "name"
- Re: WSDL 1.2 draft editorial questions
- @headers in input/output construct
- Re: updating spec
- Re: updating spec
- WSDL 1.2 draft editorial questions
- Re: The attribute formerly known as "name"
- Re: updating spec
Tuesday, 9 September 2003
- RE: On WSDL attributes
- Re: The attribute formerly known as "name"
- Re: On WSDL attributes
- On WSDL "operation"
- On WSDL attributes
Friday, 5 September 2003
- Re: The attribute formerly known as "name"
- RE: Draft Minutes 04 Sept 2003 WS Desc Telcon
- RE: The attribute formerly known as "name"
- RE: The attribute formerly known as "name"
- Updated Minutes 04 Sept 2003 WS Desc Telcon
- RE: The attribute formerly known as "name"
- Re: The attribute formerly known as "name"
- Re: updating spec
- Belated regrets for Sept 4 telecon
Thursday, 4 September 2003
- Re: updating spec
- Draft Minutes 04 Sept 2003 WS Desc Telcon
- RE: Recommendations from Patterns Task Force
- The attribute formerly known as "name"
- Re: Recommendations from Patterns Task Force
- RE: Recommendations from Patterns Task Force
- RE: Agenda, 4 September 2003 WS Desc telcon
- Re: updating spec
- RE: updating spec
Wednesday, 3 September 2003
- updating spec
- Agenda, 4 September 2003 WS Desc telcon
- FW: small updates/rewordings to the report from the Attributes Ta sk Force