Re: IBM/MSFT whitepaper on secure, reliable, transacted Web services

I'm afraid I can't because my security knowledge is at best +0 ..
I will however ask the right folks and see what the party-line
answer is ;-).

In any case, Mike's answer is probably right-on!

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)" <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; <www-ws-arch@w3.org>;
<www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 3:38 AM
Subject: RE: IBM/MSFT whitepaper on secure, reliable, transacted Web
services


>
> I know that this is a dumb question, but could you explain how the WS-*
> specs relate to SAML?  Is the SAML functionality in WS-* somewhere, so
> that the specs are incompatible?  Or does WS-* operate in a different
> space and interact with SAML somehow?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 10:16 AM
> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org; www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: FYI: IBM/MSFT whitepaper on secure, reliable, transacted Web
> services
>
>
>
> This whitepaper documents the Web services platfrom from IBM/MSFT's
> point-of-view:
>
> http://www-3.ibm.com/software/solutions/webservices/pdf/SecureReliableTr
> ansa
> ctedWSAction.pdf
>
> You may need to join the lines assuming SMTP breaks it up. The paper is
> available somewhere on the MSFT site as well.
>
> I personally think its a nice document that explains the role of the key
> WS-* specs that IBM/MSFT/others have published in supporting the
> business requirements of secure, reliable, transacted interactions. Of
> course I'm not exactly unbiased in my view; YMMV.
>
> Sanjiva.
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 29 September 2003 22:28:40 UTC