- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:47:51 -0400
- To: Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com>
- Cc: "'www-ws-desc@w3.org'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
On Tuesday, September 30, 2003, at 10:37 AM, Tom Jordahl wrote: [snip] > I will go on record as saying that while attributes seem like a useful > concept, I do no think they need to be part of WSDL. They can easily > be modeled in an interface, and the extension mechanism (aka interface > inheritance) we now have makes it very simple to define a set of > attributes that apply to a particular interface. [snip] I find myself agreeing with Tom (in spite of his liking of *Underworld* :)), but then, I've been easily swayed on this topic. I wonder if the folks who find "operation" too suggestive of objectness find attributes similarly misleading. Cheers, Bijan Parsia.
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2003 10:47:40 UTC