Re: The attribute formerly known as "name"

+1 for role
+0.75 for messageRole
-1 for messageType as I don't think we're defining a "type" here

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Amelia A. Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>
To: "WS Description List" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 10:19 PM
Subject: The attribute formerly known as "name"


> 
> Dear folks,
> 
> As promised, here is a list of suggestions to rename the attribute
> "name", when it appears on the elements "input", "output", and "fault". 
> This list of proposed replacements is in accord with issue 77, which
> suggested that this instance of the usage of "name" as an attribute was
> not consistent with other usages throughout the specification.
> 
> Several proposals for replacement were made on the 4 September
> teleconference.  Please respond to this email using preference voting,
> indicating your top three preferences (number them 1, 2, and 3, please).
>  I'll try to tabulate responses that I receive (either publicly or
> off-list) immediately before the teleconference next week.  Note that
> you are free to propose an alternative not listed here as well.
> 
> role
> 
> messageRole
> 
> messageType
> 
> messageName
> 
> messageReference
> 
> message
> 
> reference
> 
> identifier
> 
> Amy!
> (that's my name, not a proposal ...)
> -- 
> Amelia A. Lewis
> Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
> alewis@tibco.com

Received on Friday, 5 September 2003 12:52:34 UTC