- From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 07:39:16 -0600
- To: 'WS Description List' <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Webber [mailto:jim.webber@arjuna.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 4:52 AM > To: 'Mark Baker'; 'Umit Yalcinalp' > Cc: 'WS Description List' > Subject: RE: On WSDL "operation" > > It could be as simple as re-naming "operation" to something > like "messageExchange." Yeah, but a WSDL "operation" presumably DOES something. It's not just a message for the sake of sending bits around. How about "serviceInvocation" or "serviceRequest" or something along those lines? If a WSDL message does anything, it does request that a service be performed by the provider on behalf of the requester [the current WSA terminology, IIRC].
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2003 09:39:18 UTC