Re: rationale for status quo for fault references?

• From: Roberto Chinnici <Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM>
• Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:45:10 -0700
• To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
• Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
• Message-id: <3F78D216.5020302@sun.com>

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:

> Can someone please point me to the discussion that lead to the 
> status quo for fault refs [1] which has pointers to >= 1 
> messages? WSDL 1.1 had a pointer to one and I'm curious why
> we decided make that be >= 1.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sanjiva.
> 
> [1] http://tinyurl.com/p3dg
> 

The change was made in version 1.46.2.3 of wsdl12.xml on 2/6/03 (see [1]
for the diff), then merged into the main branch on 3/5/03 (rev 1.55).

Message [2] explains the rationale (look for "Why does a fault reference
refer to possibly multiple messages?").

Roberto

[1] 
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml.diff?r1=1.46.2.2&r2=1.46.2.3&only_with_tag=ComponentModelForMEPs&f=h
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Feb/0064.html

Received on Monday, 29 September 2003 20:44:50 UTC