RE: Recommendations from Patterns Task Force

David, thanks for the careful read. I fixed both. --Jeff

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12-patterns.
xml
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12-patterns.
html


> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Booth [mailto:dbooth@w3.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 8:50 AM
> To: Jeffrey Schlimmer; www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Cc: Amelia A. Lewis; Umit Yalcinalp; Jonathan Marsh;
thrasher@lexmark.com
> Subject: RE: Recommendations from Patterns Task Force
> 
> The new patterns draft looks pretty good.  I have two wording
suggestions:
> 
> 1.  Add "for each triggering message" in the Message Triggers Fault
rule:
> [[
> Any message, including the first, MAY trigger a fault message in
response.
> Each recipient MAY generate a fault message, and MUST generate no more
> than
> one fault message for each triggering message. Each fault message has
> direction the reverse of its triggering message. The fault message
MUST be
> delivered to the originator of the message which triggered it. If
there is
> no path to this node, the fault MUST be discarded.
> ]]
> 
> 2. Change "sent from (some) node N" to "_received_ from (some) node N"
> throughout.  I think that will more clearly indicate that the message
goes
> to the service.
> 
> At 10:56 PM 8/2/2003 -0700, Jeffrey Schlimmer wrote:
> 
> >WSDL 1.2 Part 2: Patterns has been updated to incorporate all but one
of
> >the recommendations of the Patterns Task Force. The remaining work
item
> is
> >to update the fault generation rules to explicitly declare which
nodes
> are
> >involved in the exchange of faults.
> >
> >Please review the draft; for your convenience, changes are marked.
> >http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12-
> patterns.xml
> >
> >While discussing the recommendations of the Patterns Task Force, two
new
> >issues were opened:
> >
> >77: Is the "name" the correct [local name] for
> >interface/operation/input/@name?
> >http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-
> issues.xml#x77
> >
> >78: Should we define an implied name if there is only one /input?
> >http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-
> issues.xml#x78
> >
> >--Jeff
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: David Booth [mailto:dbooth@w3.org]
> >Sent: Fri 8/1/2003 5:32 AM
> >To: Jeffrey Schlimmer; thrasher@lexmark.com
> >Cc: Amelia A. Lewis; Umit Yalcinalp; Jonathan Marsh;
www-ws-desc@w3.org
> >Subject: Recommendations from Patterns Task Force
> >
> >Here is the document of the Patterns Task Force recommendations to
the WG
> >that were presented at our F2F meeting on Wednesday:
> >
> >http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/meps-vs-
> iops/recommendations_clean.htm
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >David Booth
> >W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> >Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
> 
> --
> David Booth
> W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
>

Received on Thursday, 4 September 2003 17:16:16 UTC