Re: struggling with operation and message patterns writeup in spec from Sanjiva Weerawarana on 2003-09-21 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from September 2003)

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 14:13:24 +0600
To: "Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>, "Amelia A. Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00f601c38018$3f2d7520$f4c16720@lankabook2>

"Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com> writes:
> 
> Have we agreed that we need different syntax within the
> interface/operation for the different values of the pattern URI?

I don't think we explicitly said that we want to do it .. I'm
advocating that we do for the In-only, In-Out (and reverse;
depending on what patterns we choose to define). 

Sanjiva.

Received on Sunday, 21 September 2003 14:13:35 UTC