RE: struggling with operation and message patterns writeup in spec

> From: []
> That's a good question too - but I wouldn't want to (and am not
> trying to) cut down the number of patterns via this direction. I
> was just saying that if we want to provide simplified syntax
> for the recognized patterns then its harder to split that kind of
> fundamental stuff across two documents.

Have we agreed that we need different syntax within the
interface/operation for the different values of the pattern URI?

Received on Sunday, 21 September 2003 00:32:59 UTC