Re: Normative rpc rules for encodingStyle attribute are missing in Part 1

Roberto Chinnici wrote:

> Umit Yalcinalp wrote:
>> Looking at the latest part one doc, I don't see any of the rpc 
>> encoding rules that we have worked on via email and at the last f2f. 
>> For an outsider who reads the current document, there is no 
>> indication such that there is (going to be) an established URI that 
>> indicates RPC style encoding rules, and the set of rules that the 
>> operation (aka messageExchange) must adhere to. I thought we decided 
>> to add the rules and although the encodingStyle is optional, we also 
>> decided that the (missing) rules, if the value is present, were 
>> normative.
>> Am I missing something or has the spec not included the rules yet?
> The rules haven't been included yet. My recollection is that at the
> last face-to-face we agreed we'd define them in the spec, but that
> what we had at the time wasn't quite polished enough, so that we'd
> finalize them at the following face-to-face. I can add an editorial
> note before section 2.3.1 saying that we're waiting for the "RPC
> encoding style" rules to be defined. How does that sound?
> Roberto 

Thanks for the clarification. An editorial note will definitely help.



Umit Yalcinalp                                  
Consulting Member of Technical Staff
Phone: +1 650 607 6154                          

Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2003 13:42:41 UTC