- From: Umit Yalcinalp <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 10:42:26 -0700
- To: Roberto Chinnici <Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM>
- Cc: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>, WS Description List <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Roberto Chinnici wrote: > Umit Yalcinalp wrote: > >> >> Looking at the latest part one doc, I don't see any of the rpc >> encoding rules that we have worked on via email and at the last f2f. >> For an outsider who reads the current document, there is no >> indication such that there is (going to be) an established URI that >> indicates RPC style encoding rules, and the set of rules that the >> operation (aka messageExchange) must adhere to. I thought we decided >> to add the rules and although the encodingStyle is optional, we also >> decided that the (missing) rules, if the value is present, were >> normative. >> >> Am I missing something or has the spec not included the rules yet? > > > The rules haven't been included yet. My recollection is that at the > last face-to-face we agreed we'd define them in the spec, but that > what we had at the time wasn't quite polished enough, so that we'd > finalize them at the following face-to-face. I can add an editorial > note before section 2.3.1 saying that we're waiting for the "RPC > encoding style" rules to be defined. How does that sound? > > Roberto Thanks for the clarification. An editorial note will definitely help. --umit > > -- Umit Yalcinalp Consulting Member of Technical Staff ORACLE Phone: +1 650 607 6154 Email: umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2003 13:42:41 UTC